johnnycat wrote:
OK, I know most people have left this post for Carnegie - BUT... after most speculation, Monkies is a tough piece to get into - naturally, because I was approaching it as a piece of music, which, while it musically based, it is more musically PLACED. It is not standard music(no shit), but it is rather a place to dwell. This is geographical music. It puts you in a place, an environment, very same concept as Eno's ambient pieces, solitude, pleasant waves a quite airy existence on the shore of an uncharted wilderness - . FZ's is a much darker place to inhabit, (which is what you do with this type of sound) you are more deep in the jungle now, where though the environment may be peaceful in a way, there are still the things that bite, bother, and maybe eat you. Someone made a comment "hum me a piece off of this!" - When you explore the woods, or the city, and sit and listen, ya can't hum that either, but you are definitely put in a place where there is a rhythm, a sound, a pace, a feeling of space and place. This is environmental music - don't know where, not as easily defined as Lex Baxter, but this is a PLACE to exist - much more sinister and intimidating than Eno, but I believe this is the same concept, much like CPIII was. I could easily see FZ doing "sounds" for art installations, and museum's ambient exhibits if he were still around (Geez, if he could have done the recent Tut tour). GZ gave us heavy piece of heavy tough dry meat before a slathering of sweet extra helpings dessert (Carnegie).
Sound like Thanksgiving?
Nice concept Gail! Or am I full-a-turkey-based-baloney?
Great analysis!
This is the way I see much of FZ's synclavier music also. It's more about mood and environment than specific melodies and harmonies.