Plook wrote:
Plook wrote:
You do realize that most here and I am willing to say this is a pretty intelligent crowd, consider you hopelessly bound to a point of view that is both redundant in its presentation and lacking in basic supportability and when challenged is defended through childish attacks and regurgitation of so called facts that are at best half truths and more likely out right lies.
We know you think you’re helping but you lost us a long time ago, but now you are heading into Rush Limbaugh territory where you just scream the same crap louder and dress it up with funny graphics or long winded rants, while occasionally trying to bully people out of the conversation. That is not a dialog, that is just mean spirited, and a piece of crap is just fancy shit when dressed up.
So I’m leaving you to have your little crappy kingdom here where you can bully those who dare to have a dialog on the subject. But I leave you on my terms knowing exactly what you have done in the name of truth is create your own Dictatorship, where no one dare challenge the Lord of the Flies, else he be bullied and shamed.
Plook out!
I guess this is worth mentioning again...
I guess this is worth it too...
There is not ONE thing I've stated that doesn't include "supportability." But if there is, then show it to me. The ONLY time I would verbally "attack" someone, is if they're harassing me first, or if we have a history. There's no "bullying" going on either. Nor are there "half-truths" or "out right lies." I'm a straight-shooter and have ALWAYS been able to back my points up.
Your problem, Plook, is that when the truth hits you right in the face, you simply can't back up ANY convincing argument you might had to begin with. I think this is because you know you're wrong and you probably wouldn't stand a chance debating me on just about ANYTHING. These silly generalizations you make, instead of being specific, pervade most, if not all of your dialogue here. You make laughable claims and compare me to Rush Limbaugh, despite the fact I'm not anywhere near that conservative. And it clearly displays how ridiculous many of your posts are. I've asked you several times now to be more explicit when stating the claims and/or accusations you've made. But you STILL almost never back your shit up with compelling evidence or proof. And we both know why.
Also, you do realize that you shouldn't speak on behalf of others, unless you're 100% certain they agree with you, especially when trying to reinforce your opinions, right? Because I'm POSITIVE others wouldn't want you speaking for them and hence, it does NOTHING to reinforce your silly and pervasive generalizations. So, speak for yourself.
Lastly, as far as I'm concerned, Ron Paul is the best choice for the 2012 US Presidency. I have of course already explicitly stated why that is. But since you disagree, I'd like to see you make a convincing argument to the contrary and show me why I'm wrong (and that goes for anybody here). I'll listen...
tweedle-dumb wrote:
:lol:
Whatever Isaac. So now your using your other patented move, the old "blame someone else for what you do" tactic.
Shouldn't you be on some Ralph Bakshi forum Isaac?
I've NEVER blamed someone else for what I've done and/or did. Take your head out of your ass.
Once again...STOP reconstructing and manipulating my quotes.
And good luck proving I'm Isaac, Jennifer.
_________________
ONE NATION UNDER SOCIALISM
Because of Obamination's spending & socialist BS, America and much of the world will endure one of the worst depressions in history in
5...4...3...2...
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
