FalseDichotomy wrote:
Trendmonger wrote:
It's about the evolution
of the composers music definitively using the blueprints he left for performance.
Bullshit. If FZ were still alive and touring, his music and arrangements would still be evolving. Other than the orchestral scores, there are no definitive blueprints for FZ's music. It seems like you view FZ's canon in classical terms, but the canon is much closer to jazz in its flexibility/plasticity as opposed to classical rigidity.
Is it really evolution if a band merely apes what FZ and his bands did? Time for you to eat the banana.
Stactup wrote:
This conversation is bullshit. Trying to Zappa was this or that (jazz or classical) is pointless. It doesn't matter. He did what he did. Who cares about categorization? If you like it, it's bitchin', if you don't it sucks... or however the quote goes.
I like this! Of course a blueprint isn't fixed in stone except in architecture. Of course the arrangements will evolve and Trendy so often tells us how much ZPZ has been doing just that, blablabla. Of course FZ joked about jazz. Of course FZ utilized many tools of the jazz idiom.
I do however have respect for categorization. Not fixed laws, but opinions, theories, ideas, and preferences, as these things are really where music comes from. Very few artists ever got away with "just doing it".
So, what category was FZ? To be bulletproof and succint, FZ's category was FZ. Not many artists inhabit their own genre, so there is merit to the statement. But, as much as FZ could be thought of as an island, he didn't drop out of nowhere. FZ utilized numerous influences.
To quote Greg Russo in his book Cosmik Debris:
"His music touches on elements of classical, jazz, rock, R&B, doo-wop, country, polka, reggae, soul, punk, swing, pop, new wave, Broadway, avant-gare and pure noise to achieve its desired effect." Alot of postings give off the jist that music is music, so turn off the brain and float downstream. This can be great and perhaps the most visceral and open-minded experience one can have while listening. I believe that excessive thinking while listening CAN inhibit reception. But, to then vow to never think about the relationships between composers, performers, their constructions, styles, tones and evolutions would lose much of what intrigues me in music. I like to think about how music arrived to be what it is and where it can potentially go from here.