Huck_Phlem wrote:
Don't forget how Supersister and Ekseption were doing fusion right around the same time Miles and Frank were.
I think this is incorrect ... Miles and Frank were doing all this stuff in the middle 60's .... and Supersister and Ekseption did not come around until quite a bit after that.
In the end, that list is full of shit and the folks that voted in it, wouldn't know art from music, from anything else.
While I would accept a Bob Dylan (changed the perception of what "folk music" was -- which up until then was a regionalized thing that no one knew!), a Jimi Hendrix, because he taught us that the Electric Guitar was more than just aninstrument, a Miles Davis because all of a sudden, jazz ... is that jazz?, or a Brian Eno who went on to help develop a lot of things in music that became known as "Ambient" ... it is hard to see a stupid list like that and no one ever heard of any other "revolutionary" artists in this century or the past one ... that list should have had Luis Bunuel, Salvador Dali, Igor Stravinsky, Pablo Picasso, T. S. Elliot and so many others that would make the majority of those rock bands a bunch of wannabeefamous kids! You remember the artists because they DID it ... not because they sold a few records ...
In the end, what changed in the landscape of the arts they were involved in, will be remembered ... so take a hint Gayle and Dweezil, that just releasing the rock guitar stuff for the fans, or yet another version of that bizarre fiasco called Roxy ... is not what Frank will be remembered for ... above all, he was the ultimate conductor and arranger ... and if the best you can do is show it by releasing all the stuff that is easier to recognize to the ear, in the end, you are doing the composer and the musician a bad thing ... that his legacy might never recover from -- because we are not seeing it!