[quote author=Arkay link=board=rant;num=1080193464;start=0#0 date=03/24/04 at 21:44:24]??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???<br>:P

<br><br>Awright, if anyone cares to read what is usually a good magazine, but currently on my shit list...<br>Check out the March 2004 issue of Uncut. The following is an excerpt of their ridiculously idiotic review of Baby Snakes:<br><br>
"Frank Zappa was an irrelevent figure by the late '70s. Having meandered off into cul-de-saces of muso noodling and puerile satire, the 39-year-old by now mistakenly imagined himself to be the American Varese<br>...<br>Adrian Belew , Terry Bozzio and other annoyingly self-satisfied sidemen<br>...<br>tiresome band and fans<br>...<br>the music from this show at the Palladium in NYC is horrifyingly wanky:heartless jazz-prog, intricacy for intricacy's sake.<br>...<br>an exceedingly tiresome 163 minutes<br>..."<br><br>??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???<br>:P

[/quote]<br><br>It seems that someone is condamned to be "political correct". So we should say "OK, it's a free opinion, we respect opinions, etc. etc., bla bla bla"<br><br>Well, I disagree and I say that the guys of this journal should change their job. If it is true that this journal is usually good, then the Editor in Chief made a big professional error in publishing this.<br>The style of the sentences you selected is agressive and there is no analysis at all.<br><br>I usually detest musical critics: in some cases they are frustrated persons, frustrated musicians who are jalous of those who are able to play and have success. They never had a good blow-job or never had at all! <br>But there are also very competent persons who try to carry out correct musical analyses leaving apart their personal musical tastes.<br><br>The author of this article seems to be one who has taken a pen in his hand not later than 3 days ago.<br>Fucking asshole !<br>