Mr_Green_Genes wrote:
Would skeptics care to comment:
COMETA Report. The name COMETA in English stands for "Committee for in-depth studies". This report was carried out over a several year period at the Institute of Advanced Studies for National Defense, or IHEDN, a high-level French military think-tank.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDjjIQbSYgkI'd like to comment, though I'm not 'categorised' as a sceptic... even ufologists have to be sceptical
I've been involved in ufology since my encounter with two 'nuts 'n' bolts' saucers in 1977
Was involved in an important investigation of a 'hot spot' (think Mt. Washington) in 2005/6
That investigation (and 50 hours of footage) was quashed because of the usual reasons of national security
Hopefully the COMETA Report will get some press, but I wouldn't hold my breath
Considering the 'deafening wall of silence' after the Disclosure Conference in 2001, I don't expect much to change
It takes many years to even begin to grok what's happening with ufo's and associated phenomena
As it enters the realm of 'high weirdness' it gets less likely for governments to disclose what's happening
They have to be able to explain what it is, rather than admit to knowing a small part of what it is
Why should the governments be able to understand this much more than the dedicated ufologists?
Sure, they may have retrieved craft and an alien or two, but it's much bigger than that
Anyway, it'll all come out in the wash, it's just a waiting game
I find it more interesting studying the disinformation agents these days, collecting more footage
and pics is really just butterfly collecting for me, as it will never convince die-hard sceptics
This stuff can take over your life if you have an enquiring mind, and I'd rather be playing music!