calvin2hikers wrote:
Ringo wrote:
I think the legacy is in excellent hands under Dweezil. His dedication, hardwork & passion is inspiring.
The problem is Gale. She's an analog mind in a digital age. Its an absolute disgrace that Frank's music is not on itunes and other legal outlets. Gale says its for artistic reasons but let's be honest - its about $$$.
Recorded music is all but worthless now. There are generations who have never paid for the music they download. We can go round and round about the rights and wrongs of this but the fact remains that the cat is out the bag. Zappa's music should be out there in every channel possible to reach as many people as possible. Frank's art is worth far more to humanity than its worth $ to Gale.
I dread to think how many potential new Zappa fans search itunes and only find beat the boots. What the fuck was Gale thinking to make this the only available legal representation of Frank Zappa? She needs to swallow her pride and stop thinking about the recordings in terms of monitory value.
Why should she not think in terms of monetary value? It's a business, isn't it? More money = more releases, doesn't it? Anyway, this is what she said:
The questions was about keeping the Legacy alive. What Dweezil is doing makes money. I doubt ZFT releases make much money anyway.
Quote:
Ok, this is a very big answer to what seems to be a pretty straightforward question. First of all, what the studio audience doesn’t know and what’s behind the curtain, is that there is a lawsuit where certain parties are claiming many rights, digital rights being among them.
There's always a lawsuit isn't there! Its GZ's way or no way even if it harms the legacy like her stupid stance on tribute bands and festivals.
Quote:
I can tell you, absolutely, that it was never Frank Zappa’s intention that anyone would control the digital rights of his music other than his heirs, so its not anything he ever told me to sell. The fact of the matter is he published a paper on how music would be delivered in the future in 1983 and copyrighted it and just bemoaned the fact that he didn’t have the budget to hire programmers to make that happen. So he was way out there and he certainly knew. Although the term “digital rights”, at the time of his death and the time of the sale, didn’t exist, that doesn’t mean that he wasn’t thinking about them and planning ahead for what would best serve the value of the copyrights that remained with me. So he was thinking about his family at the time and he wanted to protect those rights. That’s part A.
Mmm, its easy to speculate but if I owned Ryko and paid FZ $20 million for the catalog I'd be expecting to own the fucking catalog what ever the format. She's spending huge amounts to fight this. Roxy could have been finished ten times over!
Quote:
Part B is that I am not a fan of iTunes. I am not a fan of their growth through their overbearing means by which they have a reduced value of music. First, they taught everyone how to steal it and then they said,” Oops, sorry here’s how you can pay for it really cheap!”
WTF? How did Apple teach everyone how to steal music?
The record industry fucked up and while they were in denial Apple saw an opportunity. Fair play to them I say.
Quote:
So you know, I’m not a fan of that and I’m not a fan of price-fixing, which is something they do. You don’t have a lot of choice in what you can offer and how you can offer it. I mean they just have rules and I understand that it is probably just a by-product of some of their programming issues but there should be other choices.
This is my point. She's not a fan. Well that's fine but tens of millions of people are fans and that's why Frank's music should be there.
Quote:
I believe that the future is that there will be other choices and they will be on every artists own fan site or a conglomerate consortium of artists’ fan sites that’s not controlled by an outside party that does not respect artist’s rights.
That's fine for existing fans but to reach new ones you gotta be in the loop. A simple compromise would be to allow a best of and 2 or 3 of Frank's most popular albums onto itunes and other legal sites. At least Frank's music would have some representation that might draw in new fans to do a little further exploring.
Quote:
The part C of this answer, is that up until fairly recently and even still today, the sounds are massively compressed, they are not the way the artist intended them to be presented to an audience for an audiophile experience. So there was a reason for me to engage in that.
This is an excuse. I've heard great sounding mp3 at low (128kps) bit rates. Sure quality can be better but the music is still great. It's like saying you won't put out a 16bit CD because 24bit formats are sonically Superior. Fuck, the cassette was ok for Frank.
Quote:
Now I don’t care so much about Beat the Boots on iTunes because that’s not a recording made by Frank Zappa. Those are bootlegs as opposed to counterfeits.
Like I was saying, an analog mind in a digital age. She just doesn't get it and see the amazing opportunity.