Zappa.com

History check it out make your OWN decision.

_________________
Confusion will be my epitaph

This makes my point exactley, the cause is irrelavent, the man made CO2 must go, there is no room once the naturally occuring CO2 is excelersted.

Yes! Excelersted!





















Of course!

Really, anyone with any self respect would have left that laying on the ground...what ever happened to the 5 second rule...

Your five seconds are up!



















...but what were you trying to say, anyway?

If you didn't get it, you probably wont...

is this the response you make when you don't have a response? please don't feel you have to deny everything just because you can't understand it.

Plook, I honestly do not know what you mean by "excelersted".

...and lay off my self-respect!

History, it can not be denied, look at the frequency and intensity of global heating and storms through the past , again the argument is what is causing the changes, I say man made not so much.

_________________
Confusion will be my epitaph

i doubt we can eliminate man-made CO2, but we can help to reduce it. use less, consume less, save money as well as the environment. is that a bad thing?

i know you say that the changes aren't man made, but why do you say that? are you a climate scientist? where do you get your info? i really wanna know.

I want to know what is "excelersted"!!

Shit, sorry I make a lot of spelling mistakes and people joke about it, I was playing along....sorry should have read excellerated...

You're getting warmer.

>deep chuckle<

heh heh

From meteorologist.

_________________
Confusion will be my epitaph

you don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows

I said meteorologist, wow check out the degree and what most say about the subject.
A weatherman would be obama and his buddys from the late sixties and early seventies.

_________________
Confusion will be my epitaph

still got the hots for joe bastardi, huh?

10/4

_________________
Confusion will be my epitaph

Phil Plait sums it up nicely...

"If global warming isn’t real and there’s an actual scientific debate about it, that should be reflected in the scientific journals...If there is actual evidence to support an idea, it gets published."

"So let this be clear: There is no scientific controversy over this. When the loudest voices are fossil-fuel funded think tanks, when they don’t publish in journals but instead write error-laden op-eds in partisan venues, when they have to manipulate the data to support their point, then what they’re doing isn’t science."

Again I agree climate change does happen, but to what degree does man contribute?

_________________
Confusion will be my epitaph

One degree is enough (even in humans a one degree change would make you feel not so well.)

_________________
*********************************************************************

There is actually a lot of research leaning towards the sun causing the warming (it has been going on a lot longer the fossil fuel studies) and this may be part of a normal cycle which could have devastating effects if extreme solar flares are part of this cycle as the research suggests. This could be the actual cause of the end of the last Ice Age, unfortunately the scientific establishment frowns on research that does not meet the accepted paradigm they have set.

Again the cause is irrelevant since the man made carbon will multiply the problem when the naturally occurring carbon is released, the man made carbon has to go. Keep in mind that would help elevate the green house effect, but will not slow the natural processes of the sun. The long and short of it, there is enough naturally occurring carbon in the ice and ocean that eliminating the man made carbon may not stop the effect.

Time to perform sacrifices to the Sun God!