Maroual wrote:
blsabob23 wrote:
So anyone claiming "There's no good music anymore," while hiding their head in a '1964-1977 hole in the sand,' is just plain lazy.
I may be wrong, but I understood Quilt's initial message differently, because he was talking about someone "pushing the boundaries".
Methinks he meant that it was more and more difficult to find unanimously recognized key composers that were experimenting real structural evolutions and influencing their future (such as Bach, Beethoven, Ligeti, Zappa
(although not unanimously recognized whatever), etc).
So I suspect he was looking for something different than 3 minutes 20 seconds calibrated industrial radio music in 4/4 and C major ... although this is not at all a criteria for bad music.
Maybe we do not focus on the structure of music anymore and are more interested in inventing new processes or instruments to produce and share music.
You are exactly right.
I love all sorts of music from rock to jazz to blues, but they occupy a different place in my cd rack (so to speak) then the 'classical' stuff I also listen to.
My question was more about that brand of 'serious' music. The category that FZ tried, and to an extent succeeded in getting himself recognised for.
At the end of the day it is all just 'music' so I don't suppose it matters how me or anyone else categorises it, but 'modern serious music' is an alternative paradigm to the stuff I read about in Classic Rock or Metal Hammer or Jazztimes or whatever.
I try and smoke a pipe whilst listening to it, and also furrow my brow during the complicated bits.
Cheers